- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Messages
- 640
This has been on my mind for a while and maybe I'll make a more in-depth post about it at some point, but since there have been so many frustrated posts on the forum lately, I'd just like to point out real quick what I think is the biggest source of that frustration, at least if you're using smart phone apps to meet women.
The problem:
Guys will usually swipe right on any girl they consider "doable". For most guys, that's pretty much most girls unless they're really fat or ugly. In other words, most girls get swiped right by most guys.
If you chat a girl on tinder when it's her first day on the app, the interaction will be similar to one in real life. It'll basically be a conversation. The same girl a day later has noticed that 95% of guys she swiped right on turn out to be a "match." At that point she has to be more selective or her chat becomes unwieldy.
Once this realization sets in, she starts swiping right only on legitimately "hot guys". Many of those will be matches too, even though she's an average girl, because as I mentioned above... most guys will swipe right on anything they consider "doable".
So the apps create a situation where even femals 6s match with male 9s all the time. There is a 3-point SMV discrepancy in the matchmaking that takes place on these apps!
I know a lot of guys who are actively dating in a lot of different countries and the results for the past 4-5 years have been universally the same: men always date down on the apps. They always end up with girls that are less attractive than what they used to get in cold approach pickup.
There are exceptions sometimes, but those have always turned out to be nutters, in the experience of all my friends and myself. So what you get on the apps is basically two kinds of women: either 3 points less attractive than what you could get in real life, or bat shit crazy.
The good news and solution:
Here's the good news: This situation sucks for women too. I know many guys reading this will be asking, "how does this suck for women, Karea? They get total abundance and are dating up 3 points, sounds like paradise! Why would this suck for the girls?"
The reason is that when a girl hooks up with a guy who is so far out of her own league (3 SMV points), he will consider her only one-night stand material. He's obviously not going to commit to a girl who's far less attractive than some of the better matches (which he also gets if he's a male 9).
The result is that women meet really attractive guys on the apps, and then get pumped and dumped. And then they get pumped and dumped again. And again, and again, and again. And as much as women try to be feminists and "date like men", even that show "sex and the city" admitted that doesn't work.
It's unbelievably unfulfilling to women, and crushes their self esteem totally. They make a connection with a guy they really like, they go to bed, he disappears. Repeat, and repeatagain. I've heard comments like "ghosted again? Not one guy ever even wants as much as a friendship?"
It's because dating up by such a wide margin causes as many problems as dating down by such a wide margin does.
The Solution:
Delete the apps forever and go out. All our resident forum members who actually get laid a lot agree that women have not become more difficult compared to 10 years ago (see this thread, click). At least not in the real world... on the apps however, different story. My favorite post is the one by Teevster:
Dating apps create a 3 point SMV gap. Female 6s match male 9s. This causes as many problems for women as it does guys, because it leads to them getting pumped and dumped consistently buy guys that are actually out of their league. In the real world none of this applies. Cold approach is the same as ever.
Let's go pick up some girls. Online game has always existed, even in the early days of our seduction and dating community in the late 90s. But it was always meant as a supplement, not the meat and potatoes.
2c.
-Karea.
The problem:
Guys will usually swipe right on any girl they consider "doable". For most guys, that's pretty much most girls unless they're really fat or ugly. In other words, most girls get swiped right by most guys.
If you chat a girl on tinder when it's her first day on the app, the interaction will be similar to one in real life. It'll basically be a conversation. The same girl a day later has noticed that 95% of guys she swiped right on turn out to be a "match." At that point she has to be more selective or her chat becomes unwieldy.
Once this realization sets in, she starts swiping right only on legitimately "hot guys". Many of those will be matches too, even though she's an average girl, because as I mentioned above... most guys will swipe right on anything they consider "doable".
So the apps create a situation where even femals 6s match with male 9s all the time. There is a 3-point SMV discrepancy in the matchmaking that takes place on these apps!
I know a lot of guys who are actively dating in a lot of different countries and the results for the past 4-5 years have been universally the same: men always date down on the apps. They always end up with girls that are less attractive than what they used to get in cold approach pickup.
There are exceptions sometimes, but those have always turned out to be nutters, in the experience of all my friends and myself. So what you get on the apps is basically two kinds of women: either 3 points less attractive than what you could get in real life, or bat shit crazy.
The good news and solution:
Here's the good news: This situation sucks for women too. I know many guys reading this will be asking, "how does this suck for women, Karea? They get total abundance and are dating up 3 points, sounds like paradise! Why would this suck for the girls?"
The reason is that when a girl hooks up with a guy who is so far out of her own league (3 SMV points), he will consider her only one-night stand material. He's obviously not going to commit to a girl who's far less attractive than some of the better matches (which he also gets if he's a male 9).
The result is that women meet really attractive guys on the apps, and then get pumped and dumped. And then they get pumped and dumped again. And again, and again, and again. And as much as women try to be feminists and "date like men", even that show "sex and the city" admitted that doesn't work.
It's unbelievably unfulfilling to women, and crushes their self esteem totally. They make a connection with a guy they really like, they go to bed, he disappears. Repeat, and repeatagain. I've heard comments like "ghosted again? Not one guy ever even wants as much as a friendship?"
It's because dating up by such a wide margin causes as many problems as dating down by such a wide margin does.
The Solution:
Delete the apps forever and go out. All our resident forum members who actually get laid a lot agree that women have not become more difficult compared to 10 years ago (see this thread, click). At least not in the real world... on the apps however, different story. My favorite post is the one by Teevster:
In summation, tl;dr:During lockdown I played around with Tinder. It made me feel like I was the least attractive guy on the planet. Totally self-confidence wrecking (mind you that I have professionally taken pictures).
I can tell you that I would get no results and Tinder - barely match with anyone, barely get any response.... while pulling 2 girls a week end in September. You can't play around with Tinder if you don't have your real infield game in check. When you do, you can play with Tinder as a supplement - the lack of results won't screw with your head.
Dating apps create a 3 point SMV gap. Female 6s match male 9s. This causes as many problems for women as it does guys, because it leads to them getting pumped and dumped consistently buy guys that are actually out of their league. In the real world none of this applies. Cold approach is the same as ever.
Let's go pick up some girls. Online game has always existed, even in the early days of our seduction and dating community in the late 90s. But it was always meant as a supplement, not the meat and potatoes.
2c.
-Karea.