I've done quite a bit of tinder this year and overall here are my experiences:
1) it's very easy to sleep with 6s. Maybe one in three or four girls who will meet up will fuck (on either the first or second date usually). And the number of dates with 6s I can get is essentially unlimited, as in I'm limited more by time than ability. Pleasure wise it's generally fine, I can alternate good body mediocre face with good face mediocre body etc. But each individual girl and kind of lose interest for after a month or so of casually sleeping with her.
2) it is possible to occasionally get 7s from tinder but the acquisition costs are not really worth it. Lots of flaking lots of stopping replying to messages, and even lots of full on no girls upon meeting.
3) I've calculated that the very best possible outcome for me with daygame, once I get my game to top shape, is 1 lay in 200 approaches of 7s. Now this is just a plain fact one can't argue with this. Krauser, who is an 8 in fundamnetals/smv who has essentially dedicated his life to game has about a 1 in 40 rate approaching 7s and 8s. My friend with hundreds of lays is in the same boat and about 1 in 60. So double that because I don't approach girls who are below max hotness ceiling (which is a 7, so I don't approach 6s unlike Krauser who is an 8 sometimes approaching 7s) and double that because I am not going to devote my life to game. So 1 in 200 for 7s is the best possible outcome. And actually that'd be pretty great. If I do 25 per week then that means one 7 every two months.
Now the cost of acquisition with daygame has ancillary benefits, you gain some courage each time you approach, you are out in the world and not on your smartphone and live feedback is far more informative and there is more skill to develop that way. So based on that it is stupid to even bother pursuing 7s from tinder.
At the same time look at the costs of getting 6s from tinder and 7s from daygame, there is a huge astronomical discrepancy.
So why cut one out? Seems like it makes the most sense to me to use tinder to sleep with 6s and use daygame (or nightgame if you prefer) to sleep with 7s both. Of course adjusting based on how many girls you are sleeping with currently, the weather, etc etc but it seems it's always best to have a balance of the two and consider both as viable options of sex acquisition. Or better yet cycle it, sleep with a bunch of tinder girls until you get sick of it while working on your approach and then hopefully by the time you are sick of tinder you are able to get a few hotter girls.
So it's never a question of which is better, both are good! But it's more a subtle question of the right time management based on where you are at at the time, and the right balance between the two to truly maximise the sex to effort ratio. And that itself is a difficult problem that I am still wrestling with.
1) it's very easy to sleep with 6s. Maybe one in three or four girls who will meet up will fuck (on either the first or second date usually). And the number of dates with 6s I can get is essentially unlimited, as in I'm limited more by time than ability. Pleasure wise it's generally fine, I can alternate good body mediocre face with good face mediocre body etc. But each individual girl and kind of lose interest for after a month or so of casually sleeping with her.
2) it is possible to occasionally get 7s from tinder but the acquisition costs are not really worth it. Lots of flaking lots of stopping replying to messages, and even lots of full on no girls upon meeting.
3) I've calculated that the very best possible outcome for me with daygame, once I get my game to top shape, is 1 lay in 200 approaches of 7s. Now this is just a plain fact one can't argue with this. Krauser, who is an 8 in fundamnetals/smv who has essentially dedicated his life to game has about a 1 in 40 rate approaching 7s and 8s. My friend with hundreds of lays is in the same boat and about 1 in 60. So double that because I don't approach girls who are below max hotness ceiling (which is a 7, so I don't approach 6s unlike Krauser who is an 8 sometimes approaching 7s) and double that because I am not going to devote my life to game. So 1 in 200 for 7s is the best possible outcome. And actually that'd be pretty great. If I do 25 per week then that means one 7 every two months.
Now the cost of acquisition with daygame has ancillary benefits, you gain some courage each time you approach, you are out in the world and not on your smartphone and live feedback is far more informative and there is more skill to develop that way. So based on that it is stupid to even bother pursuing 7s from tinder.
At the same time look at the costs of getting 6s from tinder and 7s from daygame, there is a huge astronomical discrepancy.
So why cut one out? Seems like it makes the most sense to me to use tinder to sleep with 6s and use daygame (or nightgame if you prefer) to sleep with 7s both. Of course adjusting based on how many girls you are sleeping with currently, the weather, etc etc but it seems it's always best to have a balance of the two and consider both as viable options of sex acquisition. Or better yet cycle it, sleep with a bunch of tinder girls until you get sick of it while working on your approach and then hopefully by the time you are sick of tinder you are able to get a few hotter girls.
So it's never a question of which is better, both are good! But it's more a subtle question of the right time management based on where you are at at the time, and the right balance between the two to truly maximise the sex to effort ratio. And that itself is a difficult problem that I am still wrestling with.