What's new

Seducing less attractive / lower quality girls for practice?

Skills

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
5,561
Yeah I used to think this way until I started having sex with beautiful girls. Suddenly you realize you don’t care as much about the things you think used to matter
So you are saying pob have never experienced what you experience... You are the only one in this forum that slept with beautiful girls... Didn't chase called you out on this none sense... Bach junior..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: POB

POB

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Messages
1,405
Yeah I used to think this way until I started having sex with beautiful girls. Suddenly you realize you don’t care as much about the things you think used to matter
cYkJc1f.gif
 

Spike

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jan 30, 2025
Messages
288
So you are saying pob have never experienced what you experience... You are the only one in this forum that slept with beautiful girls... Didn't chase called you out on this none sense... Bach junior..
And where did I say I’m the only one in this forum that slept with beautiful girls? I’m simply sharing my own experience.

This is my girlfriends body for instance
IMG-0885.jpg

All I’m saying is that it all that stuff matters less than it used to. A beautiful girl (face, skin, hair, low bf%) I care less about if she doesn’t have a huge butt.
Even tho I prefer big butts over girls that don’t have a butt. I certainly won’t pass up a beautiful girl over an average looking girl with a bigger butt.
 

Will_V

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
2,165
The 1-10 rating scale is based on solely on looks. Whether a girl is incredible or terrible in bed, has zero impact on the scale. Could be shit in bed, she’s still a 10. Could be amazing in bed, she’s still a 5.

There are two problems with this.

The first one is that guys use the scale to describe overall value. For me, at least 50% of my enjoyment is a function of how fun she is in bed, according to what I want to experience at that time. Any value scale that doesn't take that into account is worthless to me. Sex is a whole symphony orchestra of pleasurable things that together create satisfaction - her smell, her sounds, her willingness, the way she moves and responds to different things, etc. I don't even know how to conceptualize the idea of sexual enjoyment based on nothing but appearance.

The second problem is that even if we're only talking about that 50% related to appearance, there are so many different things each guy will have different tastes on. Just in terms of her face there are a billion combinations of proportions that each guy might find attractive or not.

Something I find fascinating is Chase's article on people choosing mates with similar features. It's one of the most universally consistent things I've ever seen, my brother is a textbook example. So that means guys are going around getting attracted to women based on completely different sets of features, probably all believing that their 10 is everybody's 10.

About the only thing I've ever seen evolutionary psychologists agree on regarding universal indicators of female attractiveness is the hourglass figure, which is about as vague a scientific concept as you'll ever find.
 

Spike

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jan 30, 2025
Messages
288
For me, at least 50% of my enjoyment is a function of how fun she is in bed, according to what I want to experience at that time. Any value scale that doesn't take that into account is worthless to me.
The 1-10 scale is based solely off looks. I’m sorry but a 5 doesn’t become a 10 because she’s incredible in bed. She’s still a 5 at the end of the day.
Something I find fascinating is Chase's article on people choosing mates with similar features. It's one of the most universally consistent things I've ever seen, my brother is a textbook example
Confirmation bias. If I was allowed to post pictures of my girls then you would see that pretty much none of them look like me facial feature wise
 

topcat

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
964
The 1-10 scale is based solely off looks. I’m sorry but a 5 doesn’t become a 10 because she’s incredible in bed. She’s still a 5 at the end of the day.

Confirmation bias. If I was allowed to post pictures of my girls then you would see that pretty much none of them look like me facial feature wise
the-rock.gif


what value does this guy provide here again?
 

Spike

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jan 30, 2025
Messages
288
what value does this guy provide here again?
as much as he comes across off, i got a bunch of people in the forum and in pm, explaining how baggy maxing made a difference on the seduction including myself..... Specially before anyone here knew about it, spike been saying the baggy max 3 years ago... so a lot of us got a head start, it works
 

topcat

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
964
Not that deep bro. We’ve been “baggy maxxing” over here since 2018. I can tell you what comes next if you’d like..
 

Spike

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jan 30, 2025
Messages
288
Not that deep bro. We’ve been “baggy maxxing” over here since 2018. I can tell you what comes next if you’d like..
Nah I got that shit handled. Thanks tho. I’m more interested in reading your cold approach lay reports. I’m sure I can learn a thing or 2 from a tribe elder
 

West_Indian_Archie

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Feb 6, 2020
Messages
429
If a rookie is repulsed by a girl, and wouldn't want to be seen with her - he will cop an attitude gives him license to say whatever he wants, and do whatever he wants with respect to that girl, and he doesn't care what happens.

He's actually outcome independent and focused on process.

If he gets the notch, cool. If he doesn't get the notch, whatever, she was ugly.

But that same guy can't affect that nonchalant/"say anything" attitude towards girls he finds genuinely attractive.

He only lets himself be "real" with plain Janes - he never gives himself permission to be "real" with the fine ones. His game is stifled.

It's a bad practice, in my experience.

It's very similar to guys that are "alpha" with girls and "beta" with everyone else.
 

Adventurer

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Nov 28, 2022
Messages
180
Dick hard = bang
Dick limp = pass

It's not that hard guys.
This is the truth

Complete nonfactor, everyone who's good at game has slept with good looking girls and okay looking girls at some point. Sometimes also with ugly ones when he felt like it.

Have you ever regretted hooking up with a girl because she was not good looking enough? That's what I thought
 

POB

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Messages
1,405
Have you ever regretted hooking up with a girl because she was not good looking enough? That's what I thought
Tbh, you kinda regret the opposite: sleeping with the gorgeous ones that have shitty personalities.
Those are the troublemakers who make your think with your dick and fuck up your life.
 
the right date makes getting her back home a piece of cake

Water

Modern Human
Modern Human
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
288
Wow, great advice and insights on here. I honestly thought I was going to get attacked and receive posts where everyone says “never lower your standards!” It seems this forum is leagues above other forums.

I have regretted having sex with girls who were below my standards, I think there seem to be 2 types of guys.

1. Guys who are willing to “lower their standards” or bang a less than ideal girl and enjoy it.

2. Guys who won’t go after a girl who isn’t very much their type. (not necessarily more attractive, but more their personal preference, so the guy considers them hot), and they won’t bang a girl outside of that, at least while sober.

After reading all the replies, I realize the girls I regretted banging are ones who didn’t have redeeming qualities or maybe didn’t even make me hard (cialis solves this).

But I wouldn’t regret banging a girl who’s less attractive than I would like, if they have redeeming features like a bubbly cheerful personality (I love this, but it is rare), or a cute face, or athletic bod, nice ass, or that intangible “something” that makes you turned on just by the thought of hooking up with them, even though you can’t pinpoint a specific quality that turns you on.

Have not been traumatized by crazy girls who are hot…. yet. Fingers crossed.

Great stuff.
 

KJ Francis

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Mar 27, 2023
Messages
995
This strategy has been a boon to me at times.

I think there is a big difference in your vibe when you are in high momentum. Your neediness evaporates, and you project sexual energy.

I once did one sided monogamy with a former cam girl who said she loved me. I had struggled to lay her in a period of low momentum. I pretty much slipped into the friend zone. Like we went for pedicures once, then I went radio silent. When we reconnected, I am pretty sure I slept with four different girls that same week.

None to write home about, but she said I smelled like pussy. Maybe literally, but probably figuratively.

So especially if you are shaking rust off, continually failing on dates, or pulling her and then cumming quick because you haven't had sex in a week or two, as long as your sexual abundance with average girls doesn't drag you into laziness, I think it can be a real help.

With the girl above, I don't think I even came until the fifth time I fucked her. We would have these marathon sex sessions. I wasn't purposefully doing semen retention - actually quite the opposite (with other girls). And that gave me a killer vibe. Probably like a testosterone feedback loop without the prolactin or whatever it is.
 
Top