Think I'm in a SS forum Bubble where the unspoken rule is daygame is king.
DWW my guy...
I did a forum search for "
daygame is king" and the only results that came back were from
YOU in your post titled "
Lockdown or not Daygame is King" and then
a comment from Ree in 2019...
Living in London & having a lockdown where bars are shut (again) I revisted tinder which has worked well for me in the past (20 or so lays from it) I even hired a virtual assistant to swipe for me. Long story short I got numbers quite easily but shock horror the girls were flaky and or...
www.skilledseducer.com
I know you only have good intentions with this... but you were the one to actually speak that one out. So that specific premise is a bit silly
And I understand your thinking may have changed, which actually supports my following points about the diversity of thought and empiricism on the forum vs "daygame tunnel vision."
Because from my perspective too, I don't think it's truly an unspoken thing on this forum either you know?
I'd actually say that the diversity in thought/empiricism regarding different gaming types, styles , etc., has been a major advantage of SS over everywhere else in the community. That includes the plethora of resources available for all different types of game between all the articles and forum posts. There are just tons of resources on SS/GC about so many different kinds of game and their nuances.
Plenty of different guys on this forum discuss and enjoy different kinds of game - including many who advocate for crossgaming too.
That's also part of why when you said "community" in the OP I wasn't sure what you specifically meant, and I was really surprised when you said "SS."
Given my experiences, it actually seems like OUTSIDE of SS is where a lot of the exploitative YouTube infield guys, etc., will espouse low-resolution things about daygame to peddle some thing (big difference between the low-resolution daygame POVs there and the high-resolution daygame POVs here).
Truth be told, I can't recall an active Modern Human or Tribal Elder in my time on the forum (roughly similar to your time on the forum) who DID NOT at least note the benefit in 1. Experimenting with different forms of game and/or 2. Cross-gaming in order to develop skills and discover personal preferences/what works for each individual seducer, supporting them along the way in their journey to do so. That may include daygame for the individual or it may not.
I mean, like, your guy Skills - one of the highest volume posters - is a big proponent of not just nightgaming but heck dancefloor too.
We can break it down even at a high-level for the sake of it:
Myself - crossgame.
Gunwitch - crossgame, does everything. Bacchus - viewed by a daygamer by some, but also a massive proponent of cross-gaming and was for a long time, in addition to being a big influence for that on the forum. (Not speaking on what happened recently, but I am speaking on his forum/GC contributions and all I know from him personally)
.
Carousel, Teevster (and Pelusita who was never too active on SS but certainly worth mentioning) - veteran nightgamers. Maybe even a veteran nightgamer would tell you NIGHTGAME is king in their opinion - I've heard that essentially said but won't say a name in case they don't want to be dragged into this.
Glow - daygame/nightgame/social circle, crossgame.
fog - crossgame. Flux - don't know him well enough personally to say exactly how he games now, but he definitely does nightgame is and is a good texter too.
DWW - crossgame. Topcat - crossgame.
Not to leave anyone out or anything, just some examples.
We're not really seeing a swath of posters here who are "tunnel visioned on daygame"or espouse that on others right?
Naturally, within SS there are guys who have personal preferences. Again, some of the aforementioned prefer forms of nightgame and some prefer daygame. Personally, I like everything but do also really enjoy nightgame (especially street nightgame) and kink community gaming as well.
Chase for example does make observations about daygame but he also advoates for concepts like the "Anytime Seducer" and even if he does personally prefer daygame, again this is an open forum where many have their preferences (and have expressed them based on their experience without projecting onto others).
Now if you said "SS forum where the unspoken rule is cold approach is king," then that's entirely different and I would agree with that. Heck, it's a forum founded upon cold approach pickup, of course it would be - not that there hasn't been a place for discussion on apps/online/social media/general texting/whatever because there clearly has been.
If you said there are some underdiscussed elements of certain high-upside gaming styles, sure that can also be an opinion but any of those discussions can take place if those people with the opinions feel like the time/effort for it is worthwhile.
Then at times we have seen discussions on "variations of girl types based on daygame/nightgame/online," which was beaten to death wasn't it...
Really quickly touching that though from my POV:
From someone who had an amazing LTR with an amazing girl from a goddamn niche BDSM app of all places, laid my share of Cluster Bs (and more stable girls) from early on from different forms of game, been in relationships with Cluster Bs (and more stable girls) from different forms of game, and am a crossgamer, I can see where the whole "
women are women" thing is going... but to me it's maybe not the best phrase and causes some confusion?
To me, that kinda infers women are like, the same regardless of individuality and contexts? When nah though, each woman presents a unique case because of her specific traits and contexts haha. But, nuances that work toward the same thing.
So in my mind it's more like "
each woman presents a unique case based on her own specific traits and contexts surrounding her, which may or may not be stereotypical of where/when she is approached, in which women with certain tendencies/interests may or may not overindex in certain contexts."
Basically, taking each girl individually and seeing where she's at because there's naturally going to be some degree of variation with each woman/context.
Overall it's not that different contexts necessarily have the same women or that women are the same within different contexts, it's that there's variation within contexts and we can optimze to THAT specific woman accordingly - both in terms of any screening and optimizing how to lay her based on her individual traits. That's the important thing that's stuck in my mind at least.
Y'all can feel free to duke it out over your questions though, I'm just dropping by for one post because I thought it was a bit of an unfair premise that left a bad taste in my mouth lol.
Hope everyone on every side of the pond is enjoying the holidays and here's to another great year for us seducers!
just different.