- Joined
- Jan 5, 2014
- Messages
- 3,353
So there is a saying that competitive dating markets such as say Toronto or an LA somehow lead to better players. The idea goes that a man growing up in a city where the local women are stuck up, picky, and harder to get or the local game is more social circle oriented will do better than men who grow up in an "easier" city. Such a man has honed his skills and gone through tougher challenges so he will obviously be more prepared compared to the guy who was just spoiled.
I used to think this way since well, I was that unlucky guy.
I spent a decent amount of my youth in Atlanta, especially my formative game years. Alongside Toronto, San Fran, and LA; I'd say Atlanta is right up there. The local women are very shallow, women are less attractive than you'd see in Charleston, Miami or Nashville, and social circles are more prominent in the city than others. Even the culture makes people materialistic, judgmental, and generally lack empathy compared to our southern neighbors. Add to that the self-righteous religious attitude and goody two-shoe judgmental men, you have a generally tough market.
Now you would think that anyone who gets through Atlanta and can do well there could absolutely clean up in NYC or Chicago right? I used to think that too but then I realized I was being bit naive.
After having had enough of Atlanta, I moved to NYC with some of my friends from Atlanta and we had a crew up there. What I noticed was that most men went with social circle and only got with girls in their social circles they knew from Georgia.
So I started expanding.
I met guys from California and from Toronto, a couple were even approach machines but when I compared their end results to guys I knew from NYC, Miami, or Chicago; boy did my jaw drop. At first, I thought the men from Toronto and San Fran would be cleaning up, they talked about game so much and knew so much about women yet they hardly closed in the nights I went out with them. Then I noticed my friends from more laid back markets, they were naturals.
If we were to treat this like a football game, and I am talking American football, the latter team would have won by halftime.
Now what happened?
I started wondering why my friends from more doable and easier markets were closing a lot more often and taking more girls home in Manhattan bars while my friends from Toronto were crashing hard and making a fool of themselves. As much hype as Toronto got as the birthplace of game, let's say it was rare for my friends from there to have nearly the same success my friends from easier markets did. So after getting to know them for months and even having my own epiphany around this, I started to realize why men from easier markets were also a lot better.
Men from easier cities were less bitter and lover of women.
As @Chase says, do not be bitter. I found my friends from Toronto and LA for example had PTSD almost around dealing with shitty women. They had gone through too many plastic barbies or met too many stuck up women that they thought even some cool laid back local Manhattan girl was a plastic Los Angeles cunt or some wannabe from Toronto desperate for validation. Even conversations with them showed the bitterness and negativity that my friends from easier markets lacked. It was hard to explain because it was emotional than verbal, my friends from easier markets naturally attracted people to them.
My friend from Miami? Women genuinely felt loved by him. I saw him pull a threesome one night, he was probably the best natural I knew. Even when chicks were cunts to him, he laughed it off. One night it won a girl over after she was initially a bitch to him.
My friend from San Francisco? Theories and theories about why women are bitches.
It makes sense though, why would you be so nice and cool most women you knew growing up were cunts? Having dealt with Toronto women myself, I cannot see how any man can come out sane after dealing with them for years.
It was easier to have an abundance mentality.
My friend from Toronto was a spam approach machine, he had to approach and prove himself, to him that meant everything. My friend from LA was showy and wanted to approach a lot too, he had to get a girl. Now I compare this to my natural friend from Manhattan (UES kid, cool Jewish guy) who was a prototypical natural, he just enjoyed the night and was not desperate to approach. Somehow, he had this vibe where at any given night, at least a couple of girls just happened to talk to him that night. Even if he blew it, you rarely saw it bother him.
With my Toronto friend, I noticed a scarcity mindset. What if X bar has too many dudes or what if bar Y has not enough hot girls? It was all about pussy when going out, he had the shit down to a gameplan. My LA friend was always talking about girls and pussy, even after a few drinks, various kinds of girls. My NYC natural friend? We would just bullshit at times and laugh unless an opportunity came up, it usually did for him.
Men from harder cities also came off as tryhards.
With my friend from Toronto, I noticed he went overboard sometimes to where he would grope girls, grind on them, and even try to make out right then and there. One night he got into a fight and got knocked out. My other friend from Toronto would shit-test otherwise cool normal girls who just wanted to have a good night, even got into arguments with a few, he was quite petty. For both guys, even slight insults was enough to send them over the edge on some nights.
My friend from LA was somewhat similar, he'd argue minor nonsense and had somewhat of a thin skin. For him, he had to be right and some nights it ruined the mood.
My friend from Chicago? The dude could diffuse aggressive homeless bums, angry drunks, and even made friends with a couple of drunk Irishmen who were talking shit at first.
So I made the mistake of introducing Chicago friend to Toronto friend, what happens? Well, Toronto friend initially becomes good friend with him but then after seeing how natural the Chicago friend was, Toronto friend got jealous and started trying to scheme against him.
Men from easier cities had more experience early on.
When I went to high school in Atlanta, a surprising number of guys graduated virgins. Part of it was due to how religious people were and the other part how shitty local girls were.
My friends from Chicago, Miami, and NYC had already been with countless girls during and after their high school days. In other words, due to the lack of religious restrictions, higher quality girls their age, a sexually liberal culture, and just better women to be around? They got it out of their systems earlier in life and if they choose to, they also continued to build on it. My NYC friends often did and they were naturals.
About the natural vs PUA debate.
Chase has done a post on it but my friends from easier cities were more natural in their vibe, they didn't need women. My friends from harder cities? PUAs.
So can men from harder cities prevail?
I say yes but I think a lot of inner game work needs to be done and they would benefit from just cooling off, the desperation shows.
I used to think this way since well, I was that unlucky guy.
I spent a decent amount of my youth in Atlanta, especially my formative game years. Alongside Toronto, San Fran, and LA; I'd say Atlanta is right up there. The local women are very shallow, women are less attractive than you'd see in Charleston, Miami or Nashville, and social circles are more prominent in the city than others. Even the culture makes people materialistic, judgmental, and generally lack empathy compared to our southern neighbors. Add to that the self-righteous religious attitude and goody two-shoe judgmental men, you have a generally tough market.
Now you would think that anyone who gets through Atlanta and can do well there could absolutely clean up in NYC or Chicago right? I used to think that too but then I realized I was being bit naive.
After having had enough of Atlanta, I moved to NYC with some of my friends from Atlanta and we had a crew up there. What I noticed was that most men went with social circle and only got with girls in their social circles they knew from Georgia.
So I started expanding.
I met guys from California and from Toronto, a couple were even approach machines but when I compared their end results to guys I knew from NYC, Miami, or Chicago; boy did my jaw drop. At first, I thought the men from Toronto and San Fran would be cleaning up, they talked about game so much and knew so much about women yet they hardly closed in the nights I went out with them. Then I noticed my friends from more laid back markets, they were naturals.
If we were to treat this like a football game, and I am talking American football, the latter team would have won by halftime.
Now what happened?
I started wondering why my friends from more doable and easier markets were closing a lot more often and taking more girls home in Manhattan bars while my friends from Toronto were crashing hard and making a fool of themselves. As much hype as Toronto got as the birthplace of game, let's say it was rare for my friends from there to have nearly the same success my friends from easier markets did. So after getting to know them for months and even having my own epiphany around this, I started to realize why men from easier markets were also a lot better.
Men from easier cities were less bitter and lover of women.
As @Chase says, do not be bitter. I found my friends from Toronto and LA for example had PTSD almost around dealing with shitty women. They had gone through too many plastic barbies or met too many stuck up women that they thought even some cool laid back local Manhattan girl was a plastic Los Angeles cunt or some wannabe from Toronto desperate for validation. Even conversations with them showed the bitterness and negativity that my friends from easier markets lacked. It was hard to explain because it was emotional than verbal, my friends from easier markets naturally attracted people to them.
My friend from Miami? Women genuinely felt loved by him. I saw him pull a threesome one night, he was probably the best natural I knew. Even when chicks were cunts to him, he laughed it off. One night it won a girl over after she was initially a bitch to him.
My friend from San Francisco? Theories and theories about why women are bitches.
It makes sense though, why would you be so nice and cool most women you knew growing up were cunts? Having dealt with Toronto women myself, I cannot see how any man can come out sane after dealing with them for years.
It was easier to have an abundance mentality.
My friend from Toronto was a spam approach machine, he had to approach and prove himself, to him that meant everything. My friend from LA was showy and wanted to approach a lot too, he had to get a girl. Now I compare this to my natural friend from Manhattan (UES kid, cool Jewish guy) who was a prototypical natural, he just enjoyed the night and was not desperate to approach. Somehow, he had this vibe where at any given night, at least a couple of girls just happened to talk to him that night. Even if he blew it, you rarely saw it bother him.
With my Toronto friend, I noticed a scarcity mindset. What if X bar has too many dudes or what if bar Y has not enough hot girls? It was all about pussy when going out, he had the shit down to a gameplan. My LA friend was always talking about girls and pussy, even after a few drinks, various kinds of girls. My NYC natural friend? We would just bullshit at times and laugh unless an opportunity came up, it usually did for him.
Men from harder cities also came off as tryhards.
With my friend from Toronto, I noticed he went overboard sometimes to where he would grope girls, grind on them, and even try to make out right then and there. One night he got into a fight and got knocked out. My other friend from Toronto would shit-test otherwise cool normal girls who just wanted to have a good night, even got into arguments with a few, he was quite petty. For both guys, even slight insults was enough to send them over the edge on some nights.
My friend from LA was somewhat similar, he'd argue minor nonsense and had somewhat of a thin skin. For him, he had to be right and some nights it ruined the mood.
My friend from Chicago? The dude could diffuse aggressive homeless bums, angry drunks, and even made friends with a couple of drunk Irishmen who were talking shit at first.
So I made the mistake of introducing Chicago friend to Toronto friend, what happens? Well, Toronto friend initially becomes good friend with him but then after seeing how natural the Chicago friend was, Toronto friend got jealous and started trying to scheme against him.
Men from easier cities had more experience early on.
When I went to high school in Atlanta, a surprising number of guys graduated virgins. Part of it was due to how religious people were and the other part how shitty local girls were.
My friends from Chicago, Miami, and NYC had already been with countless girls during and after their high school days. In other words, due to the lack of religious restrictions, higher quality girls their age, a sexually liberal culture, and just better women to be around? They got it out of their systems earlier in life and if they choose to, they also continued to build on it. My NYC friends often did and they were naturals.
About the natural vs PUA debate.
Chase has done a post on it but my friends from easier cities were more natural in their vibe, they didn't need women. My friends from harder cities? PUAs.
So can men from harder cities prevail?
I say yes but I think a lot of inner game work needs to be done and they would benefit from just cooling off, the desperation shows.