I entirely disagree. I've literally said the opposite.
WIA
Well I think we might actually agree, if we consider that the reason she can't get the same 'listening experience' from her orbiters is (at least partly) because of her lack of sexual attraction to them.
But then, what do you think is the value of listening itself in terms of seduction? I think it's worth mulling over this because it seems that this is the #1 thing a woman wants from an escort, something she will pay through the nose for, and it seems like an escort might have something we can learn from - after all that's the point of the article.
The possibilities as I see them are that:
a) the behavior of listening to a woman is completely beside the point in terms of seduction value, and all a woman really wants is the attractiveness of the escort, and him listening to her is not something she really cares about and is pretty much a dead end as a technique in itself.
b) the behavior of listening to a woman is something a woman likes, but only in a neutral way (not particularly helpful for seduction) and only from a guy she's sexually attracted to. Essentially wasted opportunity, but not necessarily destructive to seduction.
c) the behavior of listening to a woman is something a woman appreciates very much, it's something very valuable for her, and when paired with sexual attraction (and the ability to lead to evocative topics of personal interest to her) is a big boost for seduction.
I tend to think c) is correct because if listening is the #1 thing a woman chooses after opening a catalogue of men, I find it hard to believe it's going to nuke seduction or even be neutral toward it. The more I learn about women, the more I find that the paradoxes between what they apparently want and what actually works tend to dissolve simply by applying the right context.
Then the question is, how do these escorts manage conversations? I can hardly imagine they just let a woman sit there and whine about the nasty emails Sally from HR accidentally cc'd her on. It would be interesting to know if they use sexual topics as a way to keep a woman hooked and coming back, or whether it's safer for them (in terms of keeping her as a stable client) just to focus on personal connection, or what.
I'm very interested in this also because I had a SNL this year that was basically a textbook deep diving thing that didn't even really get sexual during the conversation and ended up with no LMR (she actually pulled my shirt off first lol). I basically spent 90% of the time listening and 10% leading her to emotional topics (relationships, family, travelling experiences, food interests etc). As far as I can tell, it was simply a combination of me listening and showing nonverbal sexual intent while she talked herself into an emotional state and built the connection between us.
I like this because this kind of low key seduction suits me, I prefer if possible things that rely on a more natural attraction buildup based on my fundamentals, rather than special techniques that might be effective but, at least for me, aren't that enjoyable.