What's new

The Onlyfans factor

Status
Not open for further replies.

Warped Mindless

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
504
Don`t even consider sugar daddy stuff until your looks go to shit.
But If you take care of yourself, your looks will never go to shit, and you pretty much won`t need that type of relationship to get regular pussy...got it?

Exception: 60+yo dude trying to bang 18yos.
Even so he`s way better IMO gaming hot older women (40ish-50ish) and supplementing with very young hookers.
Sugar baby is just a lazy hooker who demands more money/attention.
Why would we need that?
Better to get a pro and be done with it.
Even now a days if your making good money you can get in TRT and have some easy procedures done to look great at 60. Look at CrossFit 60+ competitions. Most of those guys look great still just from exercise and eating right.

Be healthy and be willing to spend some money and thankfully we live in a time where a person doesn’t have to look old anymore :)
 

Tim Iron

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
449
I’m not sure the dates qualify as “real.”

I know some sugar babies and trust me, they do not enjoy the time spent with their SDs but they pretend to keep making the money.

You’re 38, I can’t believe you would rather spend thousands to play make believe than to put in the work. To each their own though.
It's the norm in my country. A lot of wealthy guys prefer the short-cut.
 

ph40

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Sep 6, 2021
Messages
118
Well, to me, the fantasy is just as good as reality if I feel it.

For instance, I get the same enjoyment out of being a beautiful 25 year old on a sugar date now as I did "traditionally" dating a 20 year old back when I was 20 years old.

And without the money aspect, most of these women (the beautiful ones) simply would not spend time with a guy. Some of the more average college girls who do the sugar daddy thing date broke guys, yes, but I like the sugar babies who simply flat out do not spend time with men unless they have some financial success to offer - often these are the most beautiful ones, the best dressed, etc.
 

topcat

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
916
Well, to me, the fantasy is just as good as reality if I feel it.

For instance, I get the same enjoyment out of being a beautiful 25 year old on a sugar date now as I did "traditionally" dating a 20 year old back when I was 20 years old.

And without the money aspect, most of these women (the beautiful ones) simply would not spend time with a guy. Some of the more average college girls who do the sugar daddy thing date broke guys, yes, but I like the sugar babies who simply flat out do not spend time with men unless they have some financial success to offer - often these are the most beautiful ones, the best dressed, etc.
Nice.

How would you feel if you knew the thousands you were spending were going into the pocket of some layabout Lothario somewhere out of sight?

cos I know a couple chicks I think will like you..
 

ph40

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Sep 6, 2021
Messages
118
Nice.

How would you feel if you knew the thousands you were spending were going into the pocket of some layabout Lothario somewhere out of sight?

cos I know a couple chicks I think will like you..

No way would I support a girl if she had a guy in her life that was living with her or taking her money...
 

Rain

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 13, 2016
Messages
534
I have definitely banged college girls who were getting paid $500 to have a 2 hour lunch/dinner with F500 execs in their late 50-60s. Often they got paid in AmEx gift cards, and they'd just bounce home at the end of the meal - they were into guys 15-20 years older not 40 years+. I've also told girls I've banged they should be on there if they're having trouble paying the rent. I'd say at least 3 of the runway models I've dated have been on there at some point.
This one girl I had started seeing had the best pair of tits I'd ever seen in my life. She eventually disappeared to another city, I think with an SD. My buddy's very, very hot girlfriend was on there to pay her rent, she definitely wasn't sleeping with anyone else while they were dating, but after they broke up probably a different story.

A Venn diagram of SA girls would be fascinating: You have high-value women on there who are just using it as a dating hack like hi-value men do. You have college girls that want to meet or date older, successful men. You have hot girls that will meet and sleep with a guy for free, but also hope they get given gifts/cash -- but without asking for it. You have 'soft escorts' on there who will be in a fwb/dating relationship in order to get their rent paid who do ask for those things. And you have regular escorts, of course, to be avoided at all costs.

My game was always the same with any girl who told me she was on SA, I would be the older, successful alpha she could bang and often [but not always] also get to go to great dinners, museums, casinos, fun charity fundraisers with. Drinks and ubers were always on me, of course. That alone goes much further than you'd think esp for girls who do not live in the city. A $20 uber can be meaningful cost for some of them.

TBH, you'd be shocked how many of these girls will more than happy to have an experienced sexual partner that could get them off, not slut- or kink-shame, and not be clingy. I'd say 95% of them were submissives. They enjoyed being told what to do, where to go, what to wear, how to bang. 'Amused mastery,' right? Some of them were also sexually inexperienced which was a surprise at first, very curious about bdsm. And most of these girls would have a very hard time ever thinking about asking to be paid for sex.

It was a real step forward for me when I understood all these girls were the same: SA, OF, IG, Tinder. It's the same girls, the same behaviors [in their Venn intersection], even if they're not on every platform. Just like there are strippers on IG and Snap and Tinder you can meet at their club, they're gonna act the same when they meet you for a drink no matter how you met.
To clarify, have you used a sugar app to meet any women or are you doing the sugar thing with some of these women?
 

Tim Iron

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
449
No way would I support a girl if she had a guy in her life that was living with her or taking her money...
If you do the sugar baby thing, then it has likely happened - she would just hide it from you (that's the norm in universities and polytechnics in my location).

If she meets a sexy guy (who doesn't play the money card), she would keep him in her life and you wouldn't know about it for months.

It's the same way these same ladies lie to their boyfriends that there aren't sleeping with their sugar daddies.

And in a few cases, they have more than one sugar daddy.
 
Last edited:

Chase

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
6,257
And at least with the sugar daddy thing you go on real dates, even if there's money involved. With a "pro" you're charged an hourly rate and she doesn't even want to talk to you outside of that. With a sugar baby it's like real., normal dating, and you can spend a whole weekend together.
I’m not sure the dates qualify as “real.”

They are definitely not real dates.


Sugar dating is GFE ('girlfriend experience') by another name. It is just a rebranding. Guys getting into 'sugar dating' who try to argue it isn't prostitution generally seem to only be familiar with the "pay money and get a blow job / sex" variety, so they don't realize they're just doing GFE.

A sugar dating app is essentially GFE Uber: an app women can go to sell themselves as GFEs and men can go to purchase their services.

(anyone who thinks it isn't: go read this sugar baby's list of rules and tell me how this is any different from the list of rules any other pro sets herself)

I don't see a problem with guys frequenting prostitutes if they have the means for it, so long as they aren't in denial about what it is. The guys who do it all want to (nobody's forcing them), and they're doing the rest of us a favor, by collectively all sharing a much smaller pool of women. I don't have exact numbers, but if we assume each woman is on average servicing three johns per week, the broader dating pool loses three men for every one woman as a result of that... very favorable for skilled seducers.

Of course, it's messier than that... the GFE girls often have a non-paying boyfriend (like in @DonGately's examples), and the johns aren't always single guys; some of them are married men who want sex / a young woman experience without having to divorce their wives. So often the woman isn't totally removed from the dating pool, and not all the guys using her services would necessarily participate in the dating pool otherwise.

But on the whole, I think it's still good for seducers.

At the more meta level, as prostitution spreads and democratizes in the West, with things like sugar dating and like the OP's OnlyFans, we may end up seeing a shift to a society that functions more like other places with rampant accessible, inexpensive prostitution, like Thailand or the Philippines, where men do not bother learning game because they don't see a reason to. If they're horny, they go buy sex (or... naked pictures on OnlyFans, I guess?). The rest of the time, they slowly court women who might make good wives.

You can go to places with rampant prostitution and pretty easily sleep with the women there (without paying), assuming you have halfway decent game, because they are not used to being picked up by men with game. They're either being courted or bought. That also might mean that a few decades down the road, however, if prostitution prices fall far enough, the idea of bothering to learn game in the first place might feel increasingly pointless to more and more Western men... as indeed already seems to be the trajectory based on what I've seen over the past 8 or 9 years...

Nightlife has a completely different function in places where prostitution is common. It's almost impossible to find a nightclub in Bangkok that isn't crawling with pros. Same with nightlife in the Philippines, in Malaysia, Ukraine, basically anywhere with a lot of prostitution... many places you will go to and a big chunk of the women in attendance are hunting for a john for the night.

It's possible the West may be headed in a direction more like these countries, where:

  • Sex is cheap and available
  • Nightlife crawls with prostitutes
  • Most men don't bother to learn game
  • Women divide into two camps: pros & non-pros

A lot of the pros I've met tend to be high sex drive girls. Which perhaps furthers the divide; if a girl likes sex and wants a lot of it, she might as well get paid for having it, right? Whereas the girls without that high a drive find the idea less to their liking.

The pros seem to do pretty well for themselves a lot of the time, too; I've seen a lot of these chicks pair off with one of their johns at some point. It is not like being a pro dooms a girl to spinsterhood. Assuming she knows when to get off the ride, of course. I've definitely also seen some weathered old pros and the first thing that pops into mind is, "Why is a chick her age still trying to work it? Does she get many clients?"

Will the Western world become another Thailand or Philippines? Impossible to say now, but it sure looks like it's been trending that way over the past decade.

Germany was that way all throughout the 1920s. After World War I and before the rise of the Nazis, Germany was Europe's sex playground... basically the Thailand of its time. It's certainly not unprecedented to have that kind of sociosexual structure in the West.

Chase
 

Rain

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 13, 2016
Messages
534
I’m not sure the dates qualify as “real.”
They are definitely not real dates.

I agree. I don't know why though. But maybe I answered my own question below.

If I use my imagination, it doesn't feel right to pay for it like this. But, nonpua guys take a woman out to dinner, maybe they do 1date 2dates 3dates, then they sleep together. Or maybe religious ones take a few months or marriage, but the guy might always pay for dinner? Then they move in, he pays the rent, she getes pregnant, then he keeps working, she takes time off work/study, so he's "paying". But that's.... that's different to sugar?

If you get into a LTR/marriage, where you're living together 6months or whatever, and you split, is that then, she gets 50% of your stuff. So you end up "paying" anyway?

I'm not prosugar, I'm not in disagreement with you or @Warped Mindless , I'm asking a question, why does my emotions say it feels wrong, or maybe insincere is the better word, and then the logic says the guy ends up paying in some form or another anyway?

You might say she just using you for money, and this true. But then men and pua are just using women for their youth/beauty/reproductive resources. How is that different? I think thats the biggest one I struggle with, when I compare like this.

Maybe the word insincere has answered my own question? A difference between paying for food vs paying for time?
Plus you could argue, the money you keep spending in a normal relationship[eg nonsugar] when you keep working if you have offspring, goes towards the kid anyway, not to "her". And , in a normal relationship, provided that kid is yours, that's not a bad thing.
 

ph40

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Sep 6, 2021
Messages
118
If you do the sugar baby thing, then it has likely happened - she would just hide it from you (that's the norm in universities and polytechnics in my location).

If she meets a sexy guy (who doesn't play the money card), she would keep him in her life and you wouldn't know about it for months.

It's the same way these same ladies lie to their boyfriends that there aren't sleeping with their sugar daddies.

And in a few cases, they have more than one sugar daddy.
Ok so, I'm very technically adept, as I am in IT / cybersecurity, let's just put it this way: I *know* what goes on in someone's life if I want to know.

If there's a situation with a particular woman that I don't like, I either won't start something with her or cut it off once I learn about it.
 

ph40

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Sep 6, 2021
Messages
118
They are definitely not real dates.


Sugar dating is GFE ('girlfriend experience') by another name. It is just a rebranding. Guys getting into 'sugar dating' who try to argue it isn't prostitution generally seem to only be familiar with the "pay money and get a blow job / sex" variety, so they don't realize they're just doing GFE.

A sugar dating app is essentially GFE Uber: an app women can go to sell themselves as GFEs and men can go to purchase their services.

So, I definitely agree that sugar baby is basically a "Girlfriend Experience" with someone who is *not* a pro. That's the key, though, I would not want a "girlfriend experience" with someone who is a seasoned prostitute. I only target women who are new to "sugar dating" or relatively inexperienced with it. So yes, it is a "girlfriend experience" but without the major downsides of a prostitute (her insane body count, the "mechanical" nature of it, etc).

However, I disagree that it is not a "real date". What exactly constitutes a "real date" in the end? Spending a whole night, or a whole weekend with someone, is not a real date? Just because money or a wealthy-lifestyle experience was exchanged invalidates the time spent with someone?

My sister is married to a wealthy investment banker. He bought her a BMW X5 recently, and they recently bought a multi-million dollar home. Despite having met in college at the age of 19/20 and dating exclusively together until their marriage a few years ago, I'm almost positive that she would not be with him if she had not seen his potential to support her when they first started dating. He provides for her and the family. There is clearly an exchange of resources involved, and I'm sure they're both OK with it. My sister is very beautiful and could have her pick of men. My brother-in-law has enough wealth (and status) that he could have his pick of women. When they spend time together, is it not a "real date"? He is definitely exchanging money for time with her, but in the guise of a long term relationship.

I don't think it's as simple as saying that a date can only be a "real date" if there is no money involved, ever. A date can be a "real date" between a wife and a husband who wouldn't be together if it wasn't for his status in life, and a date can be a "real date" between someone who is financially supporting a young college girl as well.

The date you are idealizing as a "real date" is just a date between a man who pays nothing (and only provides his sexuality and personality to a woman) and a woman who expects nothing but sex and conversation from a man. In my opinion - this is not a smart woman, because at some point, nearly every woman can monetize her attractiveness, and the smartest women monetize their attractiveness by marrying successful, wealthy men, or at least men who have that potential in the future.
 

trashKENNUT

Cro-Magnon Man
Cro-Magnon Man
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
6,551
Assuming she knows when to get off the ride, of course.

I guess humans have always been the same.That's why CNN is able to push buttons and it still works.

The billionaire elite secrets.

Are you the owner in the metaverse or are you the owner of the metaverse? I watch a lot of my realtor clients.

Garyvee say it correct. Most "successful" people out there are sales man with a huge budget. This is not me saying because I hate that they have money than me.

I'm curious as to know what is success. I do believe it's money spam, some structure and skillset. And that GaryVee wanting the world to melt so that he can see who's the B and C players.

I just don't believe that it happens too often.


z@c+
 

POB

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Messages
1,384
I like actually spending time on dates, doing things, having fun, on top of the sex. To me, sex is only like 20% of the fun of a relationship or being with a young woman, as strange as that sounds.
It`s not strange to want to hang with VYW
It`s strange to pay for it when you clearly don`t have to
So for instance, in a typical sugar relationship, you'd give a woman a monthly stipend that you two agree on, or a weekly amount, and just see each other semi-regularly, without really putting time limits on things, all depending on how it feels to you. And if she's into you, it's almost like being a 20something and dating another 20something again.
Look, I have tried dating sugar babies just as a curiosity to check the scene.
IT
IS
NOT
REAL

It`s a commercial transaction, as much as it is with a hooker.
The only difference is it is framed better (to them).
Nothing against it but it`s fucking old men`s game ....and there is something very strange with a young dude so in love with it.

Obviously this is not for everyone, and you have to have disposable income to make it work. Because, again, to some men, giving $5k-$10k a month to someone would be a considerable expense, but to some of us, it's not.
I would use that money to pay the best coach available teach me proper game.
Then I would apply everything he taught me and get free sex with hot real women for the rest of my life.
 

ph40

Space Monkey
space monkey
Joined
Sep 6, 2021
Messages
118
It`s not strange to want to hang with VYW
It`s strange to pay for it when you clearly don`t have to

Look, I have tried dating sugar babies just as a curiosity to check the scene.
IT
IS
NOT
REAL

It`s a commercial transaction, as much as it is with a hooker.
The only difference is it is framed better (to them).
Nothing against it but it`s fucking old men`s game ....and there is something very strange with a young dude so in love with it.


I would use that money to pay the best coach available teach me proper game.
Then I would apply everything he taught me and get free sex with hot real women for the rest of my life.

That's not a bad idea, except that there's no guarantee that I'll get results after getting coaching from a pickup expert. I could throw 10s of thousands at some guy and come away with not that much in return. If I throw 10s of thousands at some sugar babies, I'm guaranteed to find someone attractive who will give me days and days of fun.

Don't get me wrong; if I could find a guy who I *knew* would get me results I would definitely be willing to spend a pretty penny for that coaching. I'm just not into feeling like a chump giving some guy tons of money just to be right back where I started. And no, I don't feel like a chump giving model-esque women money for long dates with tons of fun. I *would* feel that way giving that same money to a dude who doesn't give me enough value in return.
 

Rain

Tool-Bearing Hominid
Tool-Bearing Hominid
Joined
Jun 13, 2016
Messages
534
IT
IS
NOT
REAL

It`s a commercial transaction, as much as it is with a hooker.
When nonpua guys buy a woman dinner and if that turns into a relationship. Are those nonpua guys doing the same thing? eg its a commercial transaction or is that vastly different? Or is it grey area?
 

Warped Mindless

Tribal Elder
Tribal Elder
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
504
When nonpua guys buy a woman dinner and if that turns into a relationship. Are those nonpua guys doing the same thing? eg its a commercial transaction or is that vastly different? Or is it grey area?
Different for the most part as the girl likely has some actual feelings for the guy (unless she was just after a free meal).

That said, don’t do dinner dates with women you aren’t fucking already.
 

POB

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Messages
1,384
When nonpua guys buy a woman dinner and if that turns into a relationship. Are those nonpua guys doing the same thing? eg its a commercial transaction or is that vastly different? Or is it grey area?
That horse has been beaten to death...it's completely different of course!
A sugar baby EXPECTS money every single date.
A regular chick expects you to be a gentleman and pay for first dates (societal programming).
She will not expect gifts or pampering every time you meet her (unless she's a pure gold digger...but why would you want to date those?)
That's not a bad idea, except that there's no guarantee that I'll get results after getting coaching from a pickup expert. I could throw 10s of thousands at some guy and come away with not that much in return. If I throw 10s of thousands at some sugar babies, I'm guaranteed to find someone attractive who will give me days and days of fun.
Exactly my point!
Just admit you took the easier path and don't wanna struggle to learn seduction...there's no shame in it.
But then, why are you on a seduction forum in the first place?
 
Last edited:

POB

Chieftan
Staff member
tribal-elder
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Messages
1,384
Even now a days if your making good money you can get in TRT and have some easy procedures done to look great at 60. Look at CrossFit 60+ competitions. Most of those guys look great still just from exercise and eating right.

Be healthy and be willing to spend some money and thankfully we live in a time where a person doesn’t have to look old anymore :)
- Clint Eastwood was in his 70s making babies with an attractive chick 35 years younger than him.
- Robert Duvall just turned 91 and still is considered attractive.
- Ralph Macchio is 60...I know chicks in their 30s and 40s who would bang him.
- My late father was in his 70s getting looks left and right from 50yos
and so on...
 
a good date brings a smile to your lips... and hers
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top